FIRST DUI OFFENSE
CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTION 23152- 1ST OFFENSE DUI
Driving under the Influence (“DUI”) is a crime in California. Most of the law governing DUI is governed under the California Vehicle Code (“Ca. Veh. C.”). A DUI conviction triggers several different penalties, many of which are “mandatory” under varying sections of the Vehicle Code.
HOW CAN I BE CONVICTED OF DUI AS A FIRST OFFENSE IN CALIFORNIA?
In order to prove somebody guilty of DUI, the prosecution has to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that:
You were driving a vehicle AND
At the time of driving, at least one of the following:
- You were “under the influence” of alcohol at the time they were driving
- You had a BAC of at least 0.08%
- List Item
- List ItemIf driving a commercial vehicle or a “ride for hire” vehicle, you had at least 0.04% BAC
- List ItemYou were under the influence of any drug OR
- You were under the combined influence of any drug and alcohol
Second or third:
Also, in order to be convicted of DUI as a “second offense”, the prosecution must also prove that
- The defendant was previously convicted of at least one (!) other DUI offense that occurred within the past ten (1) years
Can I be accused of DUI even if I wasn’t drunk?
Notice that a DUI case does not always require the prosecution to prove that the defendant was “under the influence” of alcohol or was incapable of driving safely.
If, however, the jury had reasonable doubt that the defendant was driving, or that the defendant’s BAC was above a certain level or whether the defendant was “under the influence, they would find the defendant “not guilty” of DUI.
Second or Third
You should also notice that the fact of your prior offense is also something that the prosecution has to “prove” in order to be found guilty of second offense DUI in California. Prior offenses in other states count!
For example, if a jury feels, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant was driving a car with a BAC over 0.08%, then they will find that defendant “guilty” of DUI even if they also feel that the defendant was capable of driving safely. Similarly, in cases where the prosecution alleges that the defendant was merely “driving under the influence” of alcohol or drugs, they can prove circumstantially that the defendant had drugs or alcohol in their system such that it impacted their driving. For that type of DUI charge, the prosecution need not show that the BAC was over a certain limit, although evidence of the defendant’s high BAC would probably help convince a jury to find the defendant guilty.
Speak to a Lawyer today.
Call Virtuoso Criminal and DUI Lawyers today at (833) 6 NO-JAIL or contact us online to schedule a free consultation with our assault offense attorneys in Hayward.
QUICK LINKS
- FELONY DUI
- DUI CAUSING INJURY
- FIRST OFFENSE DUI
- SECOND OFFENSE DUI
- THIRD OFFENSE DUI
- FOURTH OFFENSE DUI
- IGNITION INTERLOCK DEVICE
- WET RECKLESS
DEFENSES TO A DUI CHARGE IN CALIFORNIA
While it seems obvious, remember that the prosecution has to prove that the defendant was driving a vehicle, AND that, while driving, the defendant was “under the influence” of drugs or had a BAC above a certain limit. When the prosecution cannot show that the defendant was ever driving, or that the defendant was driving with too much alcohol in their system, then their case might be weaker.
In some DUI cases, the defendant is arrested on suspicion for DUI during a traffic stop, and testing done soon afterwards shows that they were intoxicated. In those cases, the prosecution might have an easier time proving that the defendant was, in fact, driving the car while intoxicated.
Consider the following example: Tatiana drives her car into town sober, she parks her car, walks to a bar, drinks all night, and returns to her car. She never starts her car or moves it but instead just sits inside the car and sleeps. If she was arrested and charged with DUI, she would probably be found “not guilty” because, while he did drive his car at some point, he did not do so while drink or with a high BAC.
In some DUI cases there are no test results available and the prosecution’s case rests largely on circumstantial proof that the defendant was intoxicated or under the influence of drugs or alcohol. To do this, the prosecution might base most of their case on evidence from “field sobriety tests”, if any were done. Examples of this include the “one leg stand” and “walk and turn” that police officers have DUI suspects perform before arresting them for DUI. However, field sobriety test are not always reliable indicators of intoxication. A well-prepared defense of a DUI case should look into whether police exaggerate or overstate the defendant’s “failures” on field sobriety tests, and whether other factors like the weather, the terrain, or the defendant’s physical abilities made it seem that they might be “failing” certain tests when in fact they were perfectly sober.
The alleged victim can also retain their own attorney during the case if they wish. This can lead to some complications when trying to conduct a proper investigation on a domestic violence case, because your attorney may want to speak with the alleged victim between court dates or send an investigator to do so. But the alleged victim has the right to have their own counsel, and must be advised of this before your lawyer contacts them. This might cause them to avoid speaking with your attorney altogether, and if they already have their own attorney, your attorney absolutely cannot contact them directly.
Sometimes, however, it is helpful when the alleged victim has their own attorney when they are asking the court or the District Attorney for leniency in your case. Consult your own attorney about this issue if you are facing domestic violence charges.
In many DUI cases there is chemical testing available in the form of breath or blood samples. In those cases, if the test results show that the defendant’s BAC was above the allowable amount, and the jury accepts those test results as true, then it does not matter that the defense proves that the defendant was not actually “too drunk to drive”, because driving with a BAC that is too high is still considered “DUI”.
One point that is worth clarifying: there is a difference between the “roadside” preliminary alcohol screening test and the chemical tests done after the defendant was arrested. The preliminary test (or “PAS” for short) is primarily meant to determine whether an officer has “probable cause” to arrest someone for DUI. A well-prepared defense of a DUI case should thoroughly investigate the differences between the PAS testing and any subsequent methods, because any problems might disrupt the prosecution’s ability to prove intoxication. The PAS test is always based on a breath sample. A “chemical test”, however, is usually taken after the defendant has already been arrested on suspicion of DUI. The results of this test are usually what a DUI prosecution is likely to base their case on.
Be warned, however, that if you are charged with domestic violence and the court suspects that YOU convinced the alleged victim to not testify, you might be facing very serious charges such as witness tampering, even though the alleged victim still has the right to refuse to testify.
While not necessarily a “defense” to a charge of DUI, a good DUI defense attorney should always explore the possibility of a “motion to suppress” any evidence taken in their client’s case. Where police obtain evidence against a defendant through unlawful means, the court might be inclined to “suppress” or “keep out” that evidence at trial, forbidding the prosecution from using it against the defendant. This is true in all criminal cases. In DUI cases, however, a successful motion to suppress might be fatal to the prosecution’s case.
What Our Clients Think About Virtuoso Law!
He has been the best lawyer my family has come across, and we are so grateful to have had him represent us. Daniel's knowledge and expertise are unmatched, and he has consistently delivered results that exceeded our expectations.
Lovejit B.
San Jose, CA
When I decided to higher a lawyer, I shopped around some. But no one compared to Daniel & Joseph. They were extremely knowledgeable & professional. I was able to ask all my questions, on any given day & I was always met with an immediate answer, to put my mind at ease.
Paige P.
Danville, CA
Always there when you need them! Daniel and his team are truly heaven sent for anyone in trouble with the law. I have a family member that unfortunately gets in trouble with the law from time to time and I can not can not can not express my gratitude enough. Daniel is not only a confident attorney but also a Bull dog who gets the job done. Thank you so much for everything!!!!
Shelly A.
Orange County, CA
CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR FIRST OFFENSE DUI IN CALIFORNIA
If you are arrested on suspicion for DUI in California, it is highly likely that you will face DUI charges in criminal courts. If you are “convicted” or “found guilty” of DUI in the courts, you might be subject to many different penalties, some of which are “mandatory” even for a first-time DUI offense.
A person convicted of DUI, who has not had any prior DUI convictions within the past ten (10) years, can be expected to be penalized as a “first time” DUI offender.
Six (6) months in county jail Ca. Veh. Code §§ 23536; 23538
One thousand (1,000) dollar fine (plus any county-based penalty assessments could significantly increase the amount that you have to pay.
A first-time DUI also comes with many important “mandatory” penalties. These terms are “mandatory” because the court has to impose them, no matter what.
If the court does not grant probation, then a person convicted of first offense DUI must:
- Serve at least 4(four) days in county jail
- Pay a fine of at least $390
Many first-time DUI offenders, however are granted some form of probation.
Vehicle Code Section 2358 sets forth the mandatory penalties for first time DUI where probation is granted:
- Three (3) to five (5) years of probation
- Two (2) days of county jail;
- A fine of at least $390;
- Completion of a DUI school—Depending on the facts of your case:
- 3-month program
- 6-month program
- 9-month program
- You will be ordered to not drive unless licensed and insured;
- You will be ordered to not drive with any measurable alcohol in your system;
- You will be ordered to submit to a chemical test when requested by a peace officer.
If the court does not grant probation, then a person convicted of first offense DUI must:
- Serve at least 4(four) days in county jail
- Pay a fine of at least $390
Many first-time DUI offenders, however are granted some form of probation.
Vehicle Code Section 2358 sets forth the mandatory penalties for first time DUI where probation is granted:
- Three (3) to five (5) years of probation
- Two (2) days of county jail;
- A fine of at least $390;
- Completion of a DUI school—Depending on the facts of your case:
- 3-month program
- 6-month program
- 9-month program
- You will be ordered to not drive unless licensed and insured;
- You will be ordered to not drive with any measurable alcohol in your system;
- You will be ordered to submit to a chemical test when requested by a peace officer
The Criminal Courts can impose many serious and important penalties for a first offense DUI. However, the Department of Motor Vehicles (“DMV”) can impose various penalties as well, including:
- License suspension
- Higher insurance costs, and
- Ignition interlock (“IID”) obligations.
These separate penalties can vary from case to case, so be sure to consult your attorney about them very carefully!
HIRING A CALIFORNIA DUI LAWYER
Our Bay Area DUI lawyers are experienced in getting cases dismissed or earning you the best possible outcome, but it does take work. Being arrested for a DUI can be devastating. It can affect your job, professional licenses, immigration status, and can cause embarrassment. Our job is to get involved early on in the case, reduce that stress, and handle all of the steps of fighting your case. Whether that means going to trial or securing you the best possible plea deal, we do it all.